A brand new report supplies an replace on the lawsuit that Kevin Kelly and the Tate Twins filed towards AEW.
As beforehand reported by The Wrestling Information, Kevin Kelly and The Tate Twins (The Boys) filed a lawsuit towards AEW following their respective terminations from the corporate. Kelly alleges defamation and seeks financial damages from Ian Riccaboni and AEW. He additionally claims that his termination was in breach of his contract.
The Tate Twins additionally allege that Tony Khan’s feedback about how they no-showed occasions have been defamatory. The go well with additionally seeks to void the arbitration clause of the expertise contracts all three have been underneath in AEW, they usually purpose to have the court docket certify “a class-action go well with towards AEW over claims the corporate is misclassifying its wrestling expertise as unbiased contractors, slightly than staff.”
John Pollock of POST Wrestling and Brandon Thurston of Wrestlenomics report an replace. They write that AEW seeks to maneuver the case to federal court docket, particularly the Japanese District of Pennsylvania.
Thurston and Pollock word that the plaintiffs intend to request to have the case be returned to the Court docket of Frequent Pleas in Philadelphia. Stephen P. New, the plaintiffs’ lawyer, responded to a request for remark by saying that they “plan to maneuver to remand.”
Extra Particulars
Per Thurston and Pollock, the attorneys for AEW, Khan, and Riccaboni assert that this case meets thresholds underneath the Class Motion Equity Act (CAFA). That is relevant “to any class motion earlier than or after the entry of a category certification order by the court docket with respect to that motion.”
The report notes that these elements embody class actions the place the quantity in query is larger than $5 million for your complete class and the putative class, incorporates a minimal of members, and any member of the putative class is a citizen of a state that differs from the defendants.
Pollock and Thurston proceed by noting that the misclassification problem within the go well with is split into two courses, “all present and former Expertise” and “all present and former wrestlers.” These courses would cowl all expertise and wrestlers who labored for AEW from September 1, 2022, to the current.
Monetary Particulars
Moreover, Pollock and Thurston cite a declaration from AEW Senior Vice President of Enterprise Technique Chris Harrington, who writes that “290 people supplied providers for AEW as wrestlers or non-wrestling expertise underneath unbiased contractor agreements” within the given time interval. The report notes that AEW was stated to have paid these members “greater than $60,000,000 within the combination.
Primarily based on these numbers, a median of roughly $207,000 was paid to every wrestler and expertise over this era. Nonetheless, there may be presumably a disparity in compensation between the expertise and the wrestlers.
Moreover, Harrington’s declaration notes that ten members of the category reside in Pennsylvania, whereas Brandon and Brent Tate are residents of Tennessee. Moreover, Ian Riccaboni is a resident of Pennsylvania, and AEW is registered in each Delaware and Florida.
Harrington additionally writes that AEW would face a tax legal responsibility of “at the very least 9.95 % of the pay rendered to the putative class members, which means greater than $5,970,000 within the combination,” in the event that they reclassified these members as staff. Moreover, Harrington writes that AEW would “incur prices in reference to worker advantages of roughly $18,125 yearly per worker, which means $5,256,250 per 12 months within the combination.”
Lastly, the report notes that AEW lists roughly $14,594,125 in bills related to the case, in addition to an estimated 30% allotted for lawyer charges, which vastly exceeds the minimal threshold of $5 million underneath CAFA.
WrestleZone will present extra info because it turns into obtainable.
RELATED: Stephen P. New Discusses Kevin Kelly Lawsuit, Responds To Jim Ross Calling It Frivolous
