Former Indian cricketer Sanjay Manjrekar opened up about whether or not the Rohit Sharma-led facet erred of their choice for the pink-ball Check towards Australia. Sanjay Manjrekar mentioned that Harshit Rana deserved to be a part of the squad for the second Check, contemplating his efficiency within the warm-up match.
The Indian cricket crew suffered a 10-wicket loss within the second Check match on the Adelaide Oval in Adelaide on Sunday, December 8. Australia outplayed India in all three departments to degree the five-match Check sequence at 1-1. Travis Head was named Participant of the Match for his match-winning century.
Harshit Rana Ought to Have Performed The Second Check Match – Sanjay Manjrekar
Talking to ESPNcricinfo, Sanjay Manjrekar acknowledged that Harshit Rana carried out higher than Akash Deep in the course of the warm-up recreation. Manjrekar added that he did not see any subject with the choice.
“See, we noticed Akash Deep in India, we noticed him within the warm-up video games as nicely, and Harshit Rana and Akash Deep each performed the warm-up recreation. Harshit Rana even there appeared higher, and there was each cause that he ought to have performed the second Check match, and there was a good bit of hole as nicely. So, I do not assume the choice was an issue,” Manjrekar instructed ESPNcricinfo.
Harshit Rana Struggled with His Bowling within the Second Check
Harshit Rana struggled together with his bowling within the second Check between Australia and India in Adelaide. The younger quick bowler was hammered by Australian batters within the first innings. Rana conceded 38 runs in simply 5 overs after Jasprit Bumrah eliminated Nathan McSweeney and Steve Smith in fast succession.
His lack of management over line and size was evident all through the match. Rana conceded 86 runs in 16 overs at a fee of 5.40 per over. India missed an skilled third seamer within the match. Rana was fast-tracked into the Check crew following spectacular performances within the Indian Premier League (IPL) 2024.
I can not kind of visualize, , Washington Sundar taking part in and doing a much better job – Sanjay Manjrekar
Sanjay Manjrekar mentioned that Mohammed Siraj carried out nicely given his present means. He additionally talked about that the Indian crew’s choice, together with Harshit Rana, wasn’t problematic or a game-changer. Manjrekar added {that a} participant like Washington Sundar wouldn’t have seemingly made a big distinction.
“Siraj has finished nicely with the type of means that he has in the mean time, whether or not it is much like the one which he had 4 years again, I do not know, however he gave his finest, and we all the time had Bumrah. So, selection-wise, India was high quality. Simply, , the inclusion of Harshit, however that additionally wasn’t a game-changer,” Majrekar acknowledged.
“I can not kind of visualize, , Washington Sundar taking part in and doing a much better job or, , would have gotten India in a successful place as a result of the pitch was usually Australian the place, , Australia bought extra out of it. And to be honest to Rohit Sharma, I imply, Nathan Lyon additionally did not flip up regardless of the choice. It should be a kind of uncommon wins for Australia when Nathan Lyon hardly featured as a bowler.”
Additionally learn: ICC Champions Trophy 2025: Pakistan instructed to just accept Hybrid Mannequin
